Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
282-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

282-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028690 50.866357)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028647 50.866352,-1.028649 50.866361,-1.028655 50.866368,-1.028665 50.866374,-1.028676 50.866378,-1.028690 50.866380,-1.028715 50.866375,-1.028724 50.866369,-1.028730 50.866361,-1.028733 50.866353,-1.028731 50.866345,-1.028725 50.866337,-1.028716 50.866331,-1.028704 50.866327,-1.028691 50.866326,-1.028677 50.866327,-1.028656 50.866336,-1.028650 50.866344,-1.028647 50.866352)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL